Who built the parks in Myanmar's Myawaddy? Who supplies water, electricity, internet, and food? Does providing these things constitute an accomplice?
First, it is important to clarify that China is the only superpower in the world that can counter the United States. In terms of military, economy, and politics, it is very strong. A large number of aircraft carriers, sixth-generation fighters, a massive army, and a vast amount of nuclear weapons all demonstrate its strength. Even the United States would absolutely not dare to tolerate criminal groups in its jurisdiction targeting Chinese citizens with kidnappings, murders, organ trafficking, and enslavement on the scale of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands. Unless it intends to unleash all its nuclear weapons and perish together with China, but it would be completely unwise to destroy the nation and race for such a meaningless matter. If Americans had any sense, they would not do this.
From a different perspective, China would also not dare to tolerate criminal groups in its jurisdiction targeting American citizens with kidnappings, murders, organ trafficking, and enslavement on the scale of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands. Unless it intends to unleash all its nuclear weapons and perish together with the United States, but it would be completely unwise to destroy the nation and race for such a meaningless matter. If China had any sense, it would not do this.
So why do Myanmar and Thailand dare to do this, allowing criminal groups to target Chinese citizens with kidnappings and murders, and so far have not faced punishment? Moreover, these two countries have never joined Western countries in criticizing China for human rights and dictatorship issues. They have maintained good relations with the Chinese government and actively participated in the Belt and Road Initiative.
The reason is simple: these criminal groups represent certain governments. In a country like Myanmar, where warlords abound and there is no rule of law, a Chinese criminal group can establish a foothold and build its own little kingdom, and local warlords do not dare to prey on them. This group must have a powerful backing, strong enough to easily crush Myanmar's warlords and the Thai government. What is this backing? It has become evident. Otherwise, even sending a notorious criminal like Bai Baoshan to Myanmar would not be enough for the warlords to take notice. Therefore, Myanmar provides services to criminal groups, earns service fees, and gains friendship with great powers—why not?
Thailand is the most aggrieved; it hasn't earned much in service fees and has suffered huge losses in tourism, but it dares not complain and is trying to save itself, with poor results. Thailand's pillar industry is tourism. Thailand cannot be considered an accomplice; it is one of the victims.
Myanmar can be considered an accomplice, but it is a coerced accomplice.