Various "anti" have eliminated millions of elites, to the point where Germany began its attack with many unavailable officers on the defensive lines...
To put it bluntly, history cannot be examined in detail. The more you examine it, the more you realize that you were deceived in the past.
In the early days of the Soviet Union, they implemented a surplus grain collection system, directly taking away the majority of the food from rural farmers. Faced with famine, the people were forced to rebel. The Soviet Union deployed machine guns and armored vehicles, brutally suppressing the uprising farmers. It was the resilient resistance of the peasant army that made the Soviet Union unable to continue exploiting the farmers in such a cruel manner, leading to the introduction of the New Economic Policy.
There was also the Ukrainian famine and the Katyn Forest Massacre.
When you seriously study history, you will find that many things are not as glamorous as they were before. Underneath these things are the cries and tears of countless innocent victims.
Author: Lao Hu Li Zhang Bai Lin
Link: https://www.zhihu.com/question/663101401/answer/3593487928
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
Left-wing regimes are actually very pragmatic. They have no moral bottom line and worship truth only within the range of artillery fire, but they can do calculations.
Destroying your profits - the cost you need to pay to destroy =?
If it is a positive number, they will eliminate you. If it is a negative number, they will win you over.
For example, West Germany, if they mess with West Germany, the United States will get involved, and the cost is too high, so they cannot act.
For example, East Germany, if they mess with East Germany, the United States won't care, it's pure profit, so they go all out.
For example, Finland, if they mess with Finland, 200,000 Soviet troops will die, so they cannot touch them.
For example, Czechoslovakia, the West cannot intervene, so they go all out.
And for Africa, they can receive assistance from the Soviet Union, but the Ukrainian people were left to starve behind closed doors.
With this kind of regime, we need to constantly make them pay a higher price than the benefits they gain. Either make ourselves stronger or find a big brother to rely on.
In short, we cannot be exposed, being exposed will lead to our demise. We cannot join them either, joining them will result in being locked out and beaten like a dog.
Of course, if you can become Stalin, then forget what I said.
Author: Jia Yu is not a turtle
Link: www.zhihu.com/questi...
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
To make their own people recognize the "advanced nature" of the Soviet Union, all they need to do is use the KGB.
But to make foreigners recognize the "advanced nature" of the Soviet Union, they can only use real money and silver.
You are not compatriots, you are coffee music, you are infidels, who are you to consider yourself one of us? Don't be delusional.
In 1970, Solzhenitsyn won the Nobel Prize in Literature. At that time, the Minister of Propaganda of the Central Committee of the Soviet Union found him and said, "You should refuse this award, otherwise the people will have opinions about it." Solzhenitsyn angrily replied, "The people are just a bunch of assholes. You take them out when you need them and stuff them back into your pants when you don't!"
Author: Chu Wei Yi
Link: www.zhihu.com/questi...
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
You don't understand the logic of how the Soviet Union operates.
The Soviet Union itself is a parasitic combination, composed of parasites and hosts.
These parasites are actually very clever. They don't parasitize in places without value. You can see the places where parasites are most rampant, Eastern Europe, South America, and Indochina. These places have abundant natural resources and no pesticide threats. So parasites love these places, even though they have a poor starting point, why don't these parasites go to Afghanistan? Why not go to Pakistan? Simply because these places have no resources.
These parasites themselves have no production capacity. They can only exploit the hosts. If you ask them to dismantle things, they can do it immediately. But if you ask them to build something, they absolutely cannot do it.
However, these parasites are also afraid of something. They are afraid that the hosts will realize their existence. So they must brainwash the hosts, saying things like, "The outside world is too chaotic, you won't survive without me" or "It's not me who chose you, it's you who chose me." In other words, they must explain their legitimacy.
And for a parasitic relationship, the best state for the host is to be half-dead, able to withstand external changes and survive, but not too strong to cause its own demise.
Author: Nightingale Legend
Link: www.zhihu.com/questi...
Source: Zhihu
Copyright: All rights reserved by the author. For commercial reprint, please contact the author for authorization. For non-commercial reprint, please indicate the source.
Their logic is to target those who can retaliate with the least revenge. So...
The only treaty that the Soviet Union did not tear up was the Soviet-German Non-Aggression Pact. Can you guess why?
It's not about being ruthless to their own people, but being ruthless to people within their military reach. Whether they are their own people or not. Not to mention their own people, even externally, they were very cruel to the Polish and Czech people.
However, they are very friendly to people outside their military reach. Black people in Africa can receive a large amount of assistance from the Soviet Union, and Cuba in Latin America can continue to fleece the Soviet Union. Vietnam can also continuously ask the Soviet Union for money and supplies.
The key is whether they can defeat you or not. Finland is a tough nut to crack, and the Soviet Union suffered two major losses, so they treat them politely even though they are within their military reach.
The core law of Soviet-style regimes: everything is for power.
To gain power, they can betray their country and nation without hesitation.
"Brest-Litovsk Treaty":
-
The contracting parties declare a ceasefire.
-
The Russian army will be fully demobilized, and until the conclusion of a general peace treaty, the Russian naval vessels will return to Russian ports or be immediately disarmed.
-
Russia renounces jurisdiction and sovereignty over Poland, Lithuania, Courland, Livonia, and Estonia.
-
Until the conclusion of a general peace treaty and the full demobilization of the Russian army, Germany will continue to occupy the areas east of the aforementioned territories occupied by the German army on the eve of the signing of the treaty.
-
Russia immediately withdraws from the Ardahan, Kars, and Batumi regions (which were actually annexed by Turkey).
-
Russia recognizes the independence of Ukraine and Finland, immediately withdraws troops from Finland, Ukraine, and the Åland Islands, and guarantees the immediate conclusion of a treaty between Ukraine and Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey.
-
Russia pays Germany 6 billion marks in war reparations.
-
Germany promises not to interfere in Soviet internal affairs and not to launch an attack on Russia from the Finnish side.
Explanation: This harsh treaty not only caused the Soviet Union to lose about 1 million square kilometers of land and nearly 50 million inhabitants, but also resulted in the loss of 90% of coal production, 73% of iron ore, 54% of industry, and 33% of railways in the occupied areas.
To consolidate power, they can trample on the lower limits of humanity without hesitation.
During the suppression of the peasant uprising in Tambov Province, the Soviet government used chemical weapons more than once. On August 23, 1921, the commander of the artillery brigade of the Soviet government army stationed in the village of Inzasno received a report from a subordinate stating, "On August 22, 1921, our unit consumed 160 shrapnel shells, 75 explosive shells, and 85 gas shells in the battle against bandits." Such archival documents indicate that the Soviet government army continuously used chemical weapons for several months.
The Soviet Union was the first and only regime to use gas shells against its own farmers.